Page 11 of 11
Pages: 7891011
Results 301 - 326 of 326
Jake,
Can you just post all the suppliers/builders in a sticky at the top until you get the bug worked out?? Just a thought..
Bryan
by
JDGnut
-
Forum
Thanks.. but I only saw the one listed with 35 psi constant.. and the 60 demand listed for the 643 pump... Can't be too hard to get rid of the bypass or shim it to a higher pressure??? The other pump listed a 100 psi.. and we would always be below that pressure with the regulator..
Thanks..
Bryan
by
JDGnut
-
Forum
Could U run the 941 or the 543 Pumps?? I don't know what the bypass looks like on the 643.. it would be nice to get more pressure out of that pump.. (not use the pump's bypass.) The 100 psi pump would be nice..
by
JDGnut
-
Forum
Not to start conflict.. but why are the lines all the same length...
not sure of the compression of diesel fuel.. most hydraulic oils is .5% per 1000 psi.. In theory it really shouldn't make much differance... Back to the pipe.. the pressure and flow at the end should be the same at the end.. but injection lines should be also.. but it doesn't always work..
I'm guessing you a
by
JDGnut
-
Forum
BG-IH,
Do you who in TX bought that M5? I know there's still a few of those old MM Pullers sitting around...
Just curious..
Thanks,
JDGnut
by
JDGnut
-
Forum
Applications for Head part number RE26380 (Marked R86427)
I'm just going by the information posted above.
4650 and 4850 Tractors -
644E and 644ER (TRAM) Four-Wheel Drive Loaders -
9500 Maximizer and 9500 SideHill Combines -
9600 Maximizer Combine -
8560, 8760, 8960 Tractors (North American Edition) -
4055, 4255 and 4455 Tractors (North American Edition) -
9960
by
JDGnut
-
Forum
No problem..
email is JDGnutt@aol.com or just PM me here.. I'll get you my number..
Bryan
by
JDGnut
-
Forum
9.0L block with an 8.1L head gasket on it.. all the bolts line up, but the push rods don't.. Look at the angle of the push rods.. If you used the 9.0L head gasket it would work using the 9.0L head on the 8.1 block.. (I'll have to look at 8.1L block tonight.) you might have to clearance the push rod holes in the 8.1L block. (The push rods would be at a little of an angle.. and I don
by
JDGnut
-
Forum
Yes.. you will have to clearance a little for the bigger Rods.. the 9.0L had larger rod journals.. and the stock 9.0L came is radiused to clear the rods.. (you can't use the 9.0L cam, without the head... and I can't remember about the cam bearing journals size.)
This will depend on which 8.1L head you use.. If you are going to use a 2 Valve head, you will have to go to a custom pisto
by
JDGnut
-
Forum
It could work.. but it will take some work.. the cam is moved a little on the 9.0L block.. so the push rods might not clear where it leaves the 8.1 block, because the rockers are closer to the side of the head on the 9.0 L head. Also remember that the intake and exhaust ports are in different location on the 9.0L engine.. (Different locations, I mean intake is on the left side, exhaust is on the
by
JDGnut
-
Forum
You could always use the GT42 turbo.. either the 2.8 or 3.0.. there's 4 or 5 different exhaust housings.. They should be able to kee it going with the smaller housings.. And keep the cost down from the custom 3x3's..
Our local group is 466, 4000rpms, GT42, 20.8 or 24.5's with all the safety @ 9000lbs.. slowly growing.. should make a good class next yr.. (I'd like to see 505
by
JDGnut
-
Forum
Yes.. that is very close.. Thanks guys..
by
JDGnut
-
Forum
How accurate are the pumps? A few cubes?? 10 or 20 cubes?? Never seen one used..
by
JDGnut
-
Forum
I didn't make it to the meeting. Just curious about what was discussed, and what was changed? And opinions of the changes..
Congratulation to the points champions..
Bryan
by
JDGnut
-
Forum
Either destroke the crank.. smaller journals.. or weld the short side of the crank and turn it back down.. (or a new or billet crank.)
Or go thicker sleeves.. (smaller bore.)
by
JDGnut
-
Forum
I guess I did say out of control.. That's probably not the right words... It Just grew quickly from where it was orginally talked about going.. I'm not saying theres anything wrong with it.. the hotter the tractors, the better the show will be.. and the more fans it will bring... but on the other hand.. the longer it will take to bring in new tractors.. But no sense in starting a new
by
JDGnut
-
Forum
I think we'll see that current tractors in that class step up.. they guys with the Under Construction tractor.. had a learning curve on the tractor... they'll have the bugs worked out of it for next year.. And I think the CaseIH that made the last pull.. just needs a few things changed, and he'll be be running hard.. (I have a feeling he knows how to make the tractor run.. )
by
JDGnut
-
Forum
Yes.. but its back to not very clear on the rules.. there's no specs on the fuel.. I know what they are trying to stay away from.. but there nothing in the rules.. I still think this class needs to grow a little.. and then a lower class started.. (back to where this one was supposed to be.. a hot farm class.. )
Next yr will be interesting.. I hope more people get their tractors finished.
by
JDGnut
-
Forum
With the 4000 (or so..) rpm limit with the GT42.... would you be competitive on gas??
by
JDGnut
-
Forum
Well.. I think that is how the class started.. but it didn't take it long to get out of controll... for a hot farm class anyways.. I hope that in the future this class will grow to something bigger, and then have a true hot farm class... (but for now I'm just on the outside looking in..)
For the guys building the Case.. I can't wait to see more tractors out next year... I th
by
JDGnut
-
Forum
There are some Gray areas in thier rules.. it will be interesting to see if they change anything for the '10 rules.. (I know they are supposed to stay the same for 3 yrs..) I'm guessing the wheel base is going to be moved..???
Also remember you can Decube.. so if you are looking at White/Oliver line, you could start with a 8.3 Cummins.. and narrow it down a little..
I'd lik
by
JDGnut
-
Forum
I think you need the 4030 rear, with the larger clutch housing.. I just can't remember if you need the 4230 and Up housing.. or the 4040 housing.. (w/404) housing. A friend pulled a 4030 with a 414 (6.8L) but decided to start with a different tractor, after having trans problems. (At the level you are talking, you are going to be using something custom any ways..
by
JDGnut
-
Forum
Agree with Jon... need to find out more info, about the temps, drive pressures and the parts you have.. Look on the side of the exhaust housing most S300 have the size of the housing cast into it somewhere... (inside and out.) I've seen 83 to 160's on S300's used by Deere.. and a number of different compressor wheels.. With the 13mm pump, I should have plenty of fuel for the s300
by
JDGnut
-
Forum
Sascha,
Will those only give you min, max and average temps?
If you hook them to a computer can you data log with them? Software? If I could save the raw data.. temp/voltage and time, it could be droped in to excel, and graphed easily...
Bryan
by
JDGnut
-
Forum
Sasch.. that's why its called an IVT.. not a CVT... haha...
The ZFtrans is only used in the 6000 series tractors.. (and US built small frame 7000's.. same as EU's large 6000's) 7000 & 8000's IVT's are Waterloo built. Basics are the same.. but different design.
Deere was actually working on a CVT/IVT in 1958-1959, in a 4010 proto machine.. (somewhere I have s
by
JDGnut
-
Forum
What will they let you run for a block? If it has to look close to stock, you can use the 4020 style 404 Diesel block, and mix & match parts.. no idea on the pistons.. should be able to machine the diesel pistons.. custom pistons would be better.. You could always go to a new/bigger JD block.. just have to run you dist off the timing gears where the injection pump was... and find a CNG head... (
by
JDGnut
-
Forum
Page 11 of 11
Pages: 7891011