SURRRRVEY SAYS! November 30, 2011 04:02AM
IF ALL FARMING WERE TO REGRESS TO YESTERYEAR; WHICH OF THE TRACTORS FROM THE 20'S THRU THE 40'S, STYLED AND UNSTYLED, WOULD YOU BE MOST LIKELY TO CHOOSE TO FARM WITH, AND WHY?? I PERSONALLY AM PARTIAL TO THE UNSTYLED TRACTORS. BRAND REALLY WOULDN'T MATTER TO ME. IT'S JUST THE NO FRILLS RUGGED LOOK OF THE UNSTYLED ONES THAT I PREFER. THE LA CASE WOULD BE ONE OF MY CHOICES BECAUSE OF THE CUBES. THE UNSTYLED JDG WOULD BE MY CHOICE BECAUSE OF LOOKS.

Re: SURRRRVEY SAYS! November 30, 2011 06:11AM
I would go with the ones that were plug and play ready for autosteerWinking
Massey 44 my choice

Re: SURRRRVEY SAYS! November 30, 2011 07:47AM
My Vote

Farmall M

Re: SURRRRVEY SAYS! November 30, 2011 08:10AM
John Deere 730 Diesel



Mike Langan
402-910-6949

Re: SURRRRVEY SAYS! November 30, 2011 08:27AM
Oliver 88.

Re: SURRRRVEY SAYS! November 30, 2011 08:34AM
Moline UB

Re: SURRRRVEY SAYS! November 30, 2011 11:23AM
An EXCESSIVELY LARGE CUBED Farmall M ya granda always said you cant farm if you don't have a M

Re: SURRRRVEY SAYS! November 30, 2011 11:44AM
Allis Chalmers U-C !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Re: SURRRRVEY SAYS! November 30, 2011 01:52PM
MM GTB-D



Chris Watson
Watson Motorsports
Batavia, OH

Re: SURRRRVEY SAYS! November 30, 2011 02:31PM
If farming were to regress to 20's-40's I would not be farming! I would not be able to give up what I grew up with. From M to IH ..66 power, fuel price not to mention comfort/efficiancy of operator, changed dramatically (then now!). Dad and I were talking a while back that if a farmer were willing to give up all advances from 1900 he could have a sustainable farm today. (Not me!)

On the nostalgic side I wonder how the surrrrrvey picks would rate on the Neb. Hp/fuel ratings I saw in farm mag recently?

Re: SURRRRVEY SAYS! November 30, 2011 03:01PM
Just as a note an LA case is a style tractor, you need an L Case if you want unstyled. i will take my Deere 820 over my LA case anyday for use in the field both in comfot and fuel economy. i still use my 820 for lots of farm chores as the fuel effeciency of it is on par or better than many of the tractors built today. I can do the same work with it as a 4020 but burn a gallon less of fuel an hour.

Re: SURRRRVEY SAYS! November 30, 2011 03:56PM
FARMALLLLLLL MMMMMMMMMM. I'm ready, let's do it. No darn a/c to keep working, no computer issues. I wonder how much better the fuel consumption would be with some of the newer technology????



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/30/2011 04:03PM by farmall puller.

Re: SURRRRVEY SAYS! December 01, 2011 02:15AM
So far.............looks as though Surrrrrrrrvey Says is leaning more towards the styled tractors, which makes sense beings a lot of the styled tractors had little creature comforts such as live power, live hydraulics, power steering and most important of all..............a padded seat.

Re: SURRRRVEY SAYS! December 01, 2011 03:09AM
Don't forget about the Ridemaster seats on the Olivers. Those rubber torsion springs really smooth out the bumps. It's just too bad that most of the replacement ones you buy today are foreign-made and break after 6 months whereas some of the originals are still holding strong.

Re: SURRRRVEY SAYS! December 02, 2011 01:02AM
the seat on the oliver was pretty nice. I raked hay for years with a 77 growing up. them old olivers just wont die, my neighbors farm with 6 or 7 of them yet

Author:

Your Email:


Subject:


Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically. If the code is hard to read, then just try to guess it right. If you enter the wrong code, a new image is created and you get another chance to enter it right.
Message:
Website Statistics
Global: Topics: 38,669, Posts: 229,759, Members: 3,327.
This forum: Topics: 37,075, Posts: 225,935.

Our newest member JD_8520