US Auto Industry June 01, 2009 08:32AM
I hope all that have been buying the foreign cars are happy now.

Remember Pearl Harbor.......

Re: US Auto Industry June 01, 2009 11:32AM
More worried about what Klaus von Obama is going to do when he controls 2 of the big three. What the heck is the US govt. doing owning car makers, and setting salaries of ANYONE except government employees?
Has congress approved US govt. taking over the auto makers, or is de Feueror doing this all on his own?
You all voted for a change, you are getting your Hitler regieme right nunder your noses.

Re: US Auto Industry June 01, 2009 11:51AM
You might want to thank previous government,s wholesale deregulation of the financial business for getting you into this mess.funny how the story line follows so closely to the history lesson of the roaring twenties? just my two cents now fire away!

Re: US Auto Industry June 01, 2009 12:30PM
Welcome back to the U.S.! Sorry you were away for 8 years. To catch you up on what you missed, the Bush Administration expanded government spending more than any previous administration. And as far as Obama is concerned, he can say "it was like that when I got here".

Re: US Auto Industry June 01, 2009 02:54PM
Welcome to the U.S.R.A.

The United Socialists Republic of America

Re: US Auto Industry June 02, 2009 09:39AM
And Obammaer expanded government spending more in his first 100 days, more than all presidents combined since Carter.
All that voted for change, and the super right wing religous people that stayed home because you can't have a woman in power "over" you, we are all going to suffer for your ignorance.

Re: US Auto Industry June 02, 2009 01:16PM
I didn’t vote for Obama, I’m not a big fan of his.

I don’t drive a GM, not the biggest fan of theirs.

We can play the blame game and blame the president, blame the people who don’t drive a GM, blame the Japanese, blame the Koreans, blame Ford, blame the right wing religious people. Maybe the blame should be on GM for poor management. Maybe GM should make better vehicles. Maybe it’s vehicles like the Aztec that got GM in this mess. Maybe it’s years of overproduction and then selling last years models at rates so low the profit margin is negligible. Maybe GM is to blame for a majority of GM’s problems. Just my $0.02

By the way, most of the right wing religious people I know (including almost everyone in my bible study) voted for John McCain. Coincidentally not one person really liked John McCain, infact they really didn’t like him at all, but they voted for him because all of them liked Sarah Palin.

I’d love for anyone who really thinks change is going to come from either the Democrats or the Republicans to explain to me why nothing in Government has changed for the better while either has been in power. If you want “change” vote for a third party candidate. If you think it’s a wasted vote… the only real wasted vote is for a Democrat or a Republican.

Sorry for getting Political, we should probably get back to tractor pulling.



Jake Morgan
Owner, PULLOFF.COM
Independent Pulling News



This page is a free service. The cost is covered out of my pocket. It takes a great deal of time and a fair amount of money to keep this website going. Donations for: photos, classified ads, forum discussion, etc... are appreciated.

Side Note: We are no longer accepting PayPal donations. They have changed their terms of service and stated they would fine PayPal users for spreading "misinformation" and "hate, violence, racial or other forms of intolerance that is discriminatory". PayPal did not provide definitions for some of these vague terms. Woke corporate policies regarding "misinformation" could result in an automatic fine of $2,500 which would have been removed directly from the customer’s PayPal account. PayPal did backdown from some of their policies but quietly implemented portions of them in later terms of service. A financial institute has no right to monitor social media accounts or speech. This is unacceptable and I'll no longer do business with PayPal.

Re: US Auto Industry June 03, 2009 11:02AM
Amen Jake!!! I think we need to make sure we don't vote for any incumbents and get in some new blood. The world is in bad shape and if we don't get some people in the big house that will think about the other guys and not themselves we may not be worried about tractor pulling and instead worried about surviving, but for now I can't for this weekend so we can go tractor pulling!!!

Re: US Auto Industry June 04, 2009 07:30AM
worrier Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> More worried about what Klaus von Obama is going
> to do when he controls 2 of the big three. What
> the heck is the US govt. doing owning car makers,
> and setting salaries of ANYONE except government
> employees?
> Has congress approved US govt. taking over the
> auto makers, or is de Feueror doing this all on
> his own?
> You all voted for a change, you are getting your
> Hitler regieme right nunder your noses.

The government has owned Amtrak for the last 36 years and has stuck 25+ billion into that. so a couple of car companies for 50 billion must sound like a good addition to the US portfolio to Obama.

Re: US Auto Industry June 04, 2009 02:05PM
TRACTOR PULLING IS OUR SALVATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!Thumbs Up

Re: US Auto Industry June 04, 2009 02:14PM
Amen Brother!

Re: US Auto Industry June 04, 2009 02:48PM
The auto industry would not be in the shape it is in if was not for the unions . I heard it said that if you pay a man to build a car 70.00 an hour and try to sell that car to a man making 10.00 an hour it aint gonna work . The government should have stayed out and let the chips fall where they may. Let the "leaders" of gm come back to the real world and fix it themselves one way or another.

Re: US Auto Industry June 04, 2009 10:30PM
I heard it said
> that if you pay a man to build a car 70.00 an hour
> and try to sell that car to a man making 10.00 an
> hour it aint gonna work

Well... if it takes 70 $ an hour to find people putting together cars in that area, then they'd better build the kind of cars you can sell to people who can and will afford them.

Porsche, Audi, MB, BMW and even VW are not half as deep in @#$%& as GM, Chrysler or Ford - and the average car worker in Germany costs about 80$ / hour, has a 35 hour week, 6 weeks of paid vacation (usually 35 to 50% of his average salary on top!!!), a 13th salary for Christmas, unemployment insurance, health insurance, retirement insurance and usually an additonal retirement plan, free schools and university for his kids (whether this is efficient or not is a different story).

From what I have learnt in the past, we have no chance to compete with the production costs in the US and still build about as many cars as the US and usually even get an almost balanced trade with China (they have to sell tons of DVD players to pay for a Mercedes S).
Or a real life example:
The super expensive Lexion combine range at CLAAS sold WELL this year, while the low cost models for Russia and the third world struggled a little as they lost their bank support and backed out of several deals. But nobody had to be fired and the plant is operating on the 2007 level (which is still way over the capacity of the plant built just 4 years ago).
Most other AG producers had to lay off people and cut down on production drastically because they built a "simpler & cheaper" machine, they couldn't sell.

You just can't win the price battle against the Asians. If you get into that, you can count your days until you have to shut down.
You need to outperform them in their weak spots: Innovation & style - and invest accordingly without trying to pull the money out of the current production (be it unions, company owners and stockholders alike).

"The Asians will build you the perfect candle, but never invent the light bulb on their own."



Floating Finish - the German Tractor Pulling Web Show and EU Live Streams: [www.youtube.com]



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 06/04/2009 10:50PM by Sascha.

Re: US Auto Industry June 05, 2009 02:59AM
Listen here tgc!! I worked for the us auto industry for 14 years. NEVER were our wages at $70 an hour or even close, including benefits. Get your facts straight or SHUT UP!!!! The middle class is gone forever. All we have is rich people and poor people.... and a lot of poor I might add...

Re: US Auto Industry June 05, 2009 03:54AM
According to the Indianapolis Star:
Base wages average about $28 an hour. GM officials say the average reaches $39.68 an hour, including base pay, cost-of-living adjustments, night-shift premiums, overtime, holiday and vacation pay. Health-care, pension and other benefits average another $33.58 an hour, GM says.

Re: US Auto Industry June 05, 2009 04:30AM
Do you know what the costs are for the employer per hour?



Floating Finish - the German Tractor Pulling Web Show and EU Live Streams: [www.youtube.com]

Re: US Auto Industry June 05, 2009 03:05PM
Listen HERE chris7250 !!! The numbers I wrote comes from your media as they report it and even if it is less all you ever see those workers doing is standing around doing nothing or pushing buttons to have robots do the work .So if what I here and see from the media is incorrect maybe you need to set them straight and tell them to SHUT UP!!!!!!!!

Re: US Auto Industry June 05, 2009 09:55AM
But Sachsa you don't come from a country that is run by lawyers that are ready to go after any person or company for any reason because some lazy bum won't take responcablity for his own stupid action. Liability cost are unreal because some idiot is always looking for an easy way out.
Also Europe doesn't have the state of California to deal with. Where else in this work is an engines exchaust suposse to be cleaner then the air that is going into it's intake???????
If we could get rid of Califonia and lawyers this could possible be the best time in the best country in the world. I just have a hard time understanding why places like Califonia are so insane on emissions but if they cross the border to Mexico there is no emission laws. Maybe we should be more concerned about countrys like China and Mexico with their emissions and not so much on our own.
Cat just ended producing onroad engines because they were not able to meet emissions, and why is it that to meet emissions with these engine they have to burn more fuel???? Just doesn't make sence!!!!!!
Thank for letting me rant on again Jake.
Chucky

Re: US Auto Industry June 05, 2009 02:45PM
I think Europe has some pretty tight emission laws. Most of our emissionsn diesel engines will be based off their ideas.

Re: US Auto Industry June 06, 2009 12:44AM
Even if our emmision laws are based of Europe what good does it do to have 2 countries in the world with strict emmission laws and the rest of the world with none. Although I believe Europes has to be easier because Many of the articals in my Deisel Power magizine state that this engine or that engine is being used in a European automobile but is unable to meet U.S. emmisions yet.
Do any of the Russian , Mexician, Middle Eastern, Chinese, Canadain, South American countries have any law on emmission?
Now I not saying that we sould all go back to coal burning steam engines and gas gusseling tractors but a little common sence would go along way. I will never be convinced that an engine that gets worse fuel economy then the engine it replaced just so the air it expelles can be cleaner is better for this county.
Thanks Chucky

Re: US Auto Industry June 06, 2009 02:32AM
wonder how long before some idiot wants to crack down on our smoker tractors

Re: US Auto Industry June 06, 2009 03:28AM
First) Europe is not one country, it is a continent. Europe is made up of 45 countries, 27 of which are in the European Union.

Second) Many European companies are meeting the strict emission standards. If CAT can't meet those standards then CAT should consider hiring some new engineers, because the standards can, and are being met. Why should the bar be lowered for CAT? We all ready have 'no child left behind' we don’t need 'no company left behind'.

Third) Fuel economy is at the forefront with emissions. You write as if the fuel economy is taking a back seat when infact the opposite is true, the goal is high fuel economy with complete combustion. The truth is America is obsessed with unnecessary horsepower.

Re: US Auto Industry June 06, 2009 03:58AM
CAT can meet the specs. Profitability is low in that market.
The available market share is shrinking with PACCAR (Kenworth,Peterbuilt) only selling trucks with thier engines in the near future,same with NAVISTAR and MACK.
I believe CAT is a supplier of fuel systems,electronics and castings for some of these new motors. So, almost CAT powered ,well designed anyway!

Re: US Auto Industry June 06, 2009 10:05AM
You must not be involved in the trucking industry in any way becasuse all your "facts" are wrong. Now for my opinion. Cat was not so hot anyway. Expensive to buy and expensive to fix. Overated no matter how you look at it.

Re: US Auto Industry June 10, 2009 01:21AM
chucky Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Although I believe Europes has
> to be easier because Many of the articals in my
> Deisel Power magizine state that this engine or
> that engine is being used in a European automobile
> but is unable to meet U.S. emmisions yet.
> Thanks Chucky


I think I know how that worked and why there is engines here that were not available in the US:

First how it works here:
They set a new emission standard here every few years that , in case of trucks, will let you run with low road tax (where I come from you pay by miles traveled & number of axles - checked with onboard GPS units and automatic scales in the roads, that even take pictures of your license plate and will automatically let the cops know if you are cheating). Like currently I think a "Euro 5" truck (that's the ones with the Ad Blue system) is cheaper road tax than a "Euro 4" Truck. You can still register a Euro 4 or Euro 3 truck - but pay more tax on it. That may be a reason why some engines are still sold here but not in the US.

Pretty much the same for diesels in cars.
I pay car tax by cui multiplicated by a factor, which is based upon the emission standard of my car. Every time a new emission standard is out, the tax for the lower emission cars is raised.
Like mine (2002 VW engine) is rated Euro 3.
To enter certain "heavy polluted areas" (like city centers) you currently need a Euro 2 car at least. Next year the level will be raised to Euro 3 - then in a few years to Euro 4 -- so by then I could only use that car "in the country side".

What was (and to a point) still is a problem with the Diesel cars / engines in the US (and why they were available here but not in the US), too:

You probably remember the first TDIs, which all had mechanical injection.

When they changed to direct injection with common rail with piezoelectric injectors (euro 4) to meet the tougher emission laws in the EU and US (and make more power) they couldn't sell them to the US, because the average road diesel in the US was "too dirty" and would have plugged the injectors.

So those cars / engines never made it to the US and e.G. the VW TDIs were not available in the US anymore.
That generation of "Euro 4" Diesel engines, are now exported again, as the quality level of the road diesel in the US was increased and there now is kind of an infrastructure of fuel stations for them.
I think for California they also need the AdBlue (goat piss) - which should be alike our Euro 5 specification.

The technology in the diesel market just now is incredible. The new Mercedes E Class has a 2.1 Liter 4 Banger diesel with two stage turbocharging, making 204 hp, creating it's maximum torque of 400 ft/lbs at only 1600 rpm. Average fuel consumption is rated at 48 mpg, 0-60 in 7.9 sec, top speed limited to 155 mph.
@#$%& the Prius joke...





Floating Finish - the German Tractor Pulling Web Show and EU Live Streams: [www.youtube.com]



Edited 7 time(s). Last edit at 06/10/2009 01:36AM by Sascha.

Re: US Auto Industry June 08, 2009 02:33AM
Hi!
You are right on the liability problem in the US.
That's just part of the story though.
We live on EXPORT

The standard of living here (Germany) is based upon selling products to other countries. We have like no natural resources and have to import pretty much everything and then turn those "raw materials" into something that other people want. Not as effective and more work as the stock market and "financial products", but it works.

So the circumstances in our laws and emission standards (which are automatically increasing every two or three years here) are only valid for part of our production. The "trick" is to build stuff that works on foreign markets (and then import less value than you put out).

And in that view, a big part of the US industry just simply fails.
There is some business where the US exports a lot and has top notch technology. Apple computers come to my mind there.
Then others where actions of "protection of the market" or "do it differently than everybody else" have maybe helped in the first view, but then had disastrous consequences later on.

An easy to understand subject is the market of semis / trucks (even though that one if pretty much belly up all around the world right now).

Lets go back in time like 50 years.

1950s Kenworth

1950s MAN

1969 Kennworth:


1969 MANs

And the cabover version:


Looking at those pictures we have very simple trucks. Completely manual, steel everything...

The MAN has a planetary rearend. Not really a power saver, but one axle less is still one axle less to build.

The Kenworth probably is the way better ride (more power, Fuller transmission while the MAN probably has a unsynchronized ZF, which is HARD work ), ...

What caught my eye though: That MAN has a one piece windscreen, which is not easy to produce.

Anyhow.. the Kennworth would be the one to have. But basically there is not "that much" difference in between them.


10 years later (1979)
World upside down:



Kenworth has changed to.. hmm...



MAN went Fuller Transmission, full air ride (and power steering, power brakes) and put the engine behind the cabin and under the frame. Talking about a SPACEY cabin with flat floor - even though it's butt ugly.
A bunch of ugly (but cheap) plastic used.

Length restrictions have forced anything but cab overs out of the market.
US trucker unions fought the length restrictions (successfully?) because a real trucker needs the engine in the front!
EU truckers are sure not happy about running cabovers, but hauling more in the same length makes sense and the spacey cab make up for it - a bit.

1989
Kennworth:


So it got a plastic hood and probably air ride.


MAN expanded the cab - you can now stand up. Fuller transmission was replaced with a synchronized ZF manual.

1999



New design with plenty of space! Below - still the same machine.


Not that much has changed from the outside. But inside!
Cabin is air suspended.
Semi automatic (you only "select" gears with a little joystick and engage the clutch). Engine is back under the cabin because the flat lying inline 6 engines couldn't meet emission laws anymore (which was still a popular option on the fore runner)


The current models:



Fully automatic, intader brakes (generator style engine brake, engaged in steps when going downhill), running according to the Euro 5 emission laws (takes the addition of AdBlue liquid to be injected in the exhaust filters) and TONS of electronics you wouldn't want on a long haul through the middle of nowhere. Does about 8 mpg with 40 metric tons (and yes, the emission laws have brought the fuel consumption up)...
400 to 680 hp inline 6 and V8s.
Link to product book for those who wonder.

Now.. two nice looking units.
Problem with the Kenworth unit:
In Europe (and many other countries) you pay road tax per axle and exhaust classification and have a maximum length of the complete rig.

So you would have to do something to the driver's cabin on the Kenworth to even get enough load on to be a competitive trucker. Then have to pay extra road tax for the extra axle and the lack of an AdBlue injection system...

You sure look cooler in the Kenworth, but you can't sell the Kenworth anywhere but in the US / Canada and second world countries anymore.

So - different regulations have led to different trucks.

Fine and dandy within your own borders - but that's not what's giving a country wealth beyond it's own resources...

The US trucks sure are THE choice for the long haul with their simpler general layout and less parts to break, but that's not what the "wealthy" trucking companies in the developed countries pay for (where you don't have to work 20 hours to pay for one hour of the guy assembling the truck).

They don't bother the need of highly qualified service mechanics but sure hate to pay for "not usuably for freight space" on the truck and extra road tax. And they don't bother about extra room for their employed truckers (the "free trucker" has looooong gone here).



Floating Finish - the German Tractor Pulling Web Show and EU Live Streams: [www.youtube.com]



Edited 6 time(s). Last edit at 06/08/2009 03:09AM by Sascha.

Re: US Auto Industry June 09, 2009 03:44AM
I agree with you completely!!

Author:

Your Email:


Subject:


Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically. If the code is hard to read, then just try to guess it right. If you enter the wrong code, a new image is created and you get another chance to enter it right.
Message:
Website Statistics
Global: Topics: 38,771, Posts: 229,938, Members: 3,338.
This forum: Topics: 37,096, Posts: 226,027.

Our newest member Jacklovik2009