09:22:14am, Tuesday, May 21, 2024
9500# Pro Field 466@3500rpm vs 640@3000rpm
|
Looking to buy a tractor for our local 9500# Pro Field class. You can run either a 466 and smaller @ 3500 RPM or 467+ @ 3000 RPM. Wondering which combination will yield more power? Mike |
Re: 9500# Pro Field 466@3500rpm vs 640@3000rpm
|
My Opinion
|
In an association near me the 466's at 3500 rpms are beating up on the bigger cubic inch tractors at 3000 rpms.. |
Re: 9500# Pro Field 466@3500rpm vs 640@3000rpm
|
Same here in Mid Missouri. Even the big 640 cu guys. |
Re: 9500# Pro Field 466@3500rpm vs 640@3000rpm
|
Depends
|
Depends on turbo rules and a few other rules that you may have to go by |
Re: 9500# Pro Field 466@3500rpm vs 640@3000rpm
|
3x3 smooth bore turbo |
Re: 9500# Pro Field 466@3500rpm vs 640@3000rpm
|
Depends
|
Definitely 466 |
Re: 9500# Pro Field 466@3500rpm vs 640@3000rpm
|
Mo puller
|
What about at same 3500 rpm |
Re: 9500# Pro Field 466@3500rpm vs 640@3000rpm
|
Bigger is better
|
The bigger cube engines will walk all over the 466 if they know what they are doing and are running same rpm. Remember there is no replacement for displacement. You can't take a 466 and run with bigger cube engines. |
Re: 9500# Pro Field 466@3500rpm vs 640@3000rpm
|
Like to know
|
Just curious if anyone has any hard facts and knowledge on comparison between big engines vs. Smaller? I've heard of this phenomenon However don't know if any of it is true? |
Re: 9500# Pro Field 466@3500rpm vs 640@3000rpm
|
Registered: 04/04/2008 Posts: 1,523 |
The no replacement for displacement thought process went out the window a long time ago.it was popular before the days of good airflow and good camshaft tech.since much better cam profiles and port technology has moved from bigger cfm to increased air speed the lazy big cu.in will always lose to a well fed smaller cu.in every time |
Re: 9500# Pro Field 466@3500rpm vs 640@3000rpm
|
Probably not
|
Still believe rule of no replacement for displacement have cams design really came that far for a 466 rpm class to really make up the difference of as much as almost 200 cubic inches for a class that’s been around for awhile |
Re: 9500# Pro Field 466@3500rpm vs 640@3000rpm
|
Turbo ?
|
what turbo are you all talking about running for this style class |
Re: 9500# Pro Field 466@3500rpm vs 640@3000rpm
|
My Opinion
|
Those extra 500 rpms sure make those 466's run good in a Pro Field class.... |
Re: 9500# Pro Field 466@3500rpm vs 640@3000rpm
|
Badger Pro
|
Is Burkhardt 640 or 466 with the Git-r-Done tractor? That's an unbelievably competitive red one in a 640 class. |
Re: 9500# Pro Field 466@3500rpm vs 640@3000rpm
|
smallblock
|
If a 466 can out run a 640 or even a 619 then why even have 640 Super Farms etc.. I may have seen it or even done it a few times but not if the 600 + has done their home work. What I see in my region is light limited 466 motors and SF 600 motors running in the pro-field/farm and hot farm classes. Remember you can do all the things patches is saying on a 600+ motor too. |
Re: 9500# Pro Field 466@3500rpm vs 640@3000rpm
|
plum krazy
|
always going to be some small engines beating up on a bigger motor,but when the same things are done to the bigger cubic inch,-- not so much,more power means more driver skill required,so not always power to win,set up,skill,-- luck for sure,I have pleanty of power to win,-- just don't drive it up to full potential.My SBC is tough to beat,most big blocks don't have enough,but the ones tuned like mine have a torque advantage,but I am lucky to drive and put weights better. LOL |
Re: 9500# Pro Field 466@3500rpm vs 640@3000rpm
|
Seen it done
|
I know of some 466s in Missouri that run very well against bigger engines. |
Re: 9500# Pro Field 466@3500rpm vs 640@3000rpm
|
Also
|
I’ve seen it done also but with intercooler on 466 vs no cooler on big cube but still depends on rules for club your pulling with turbo water etc |
Re: 9500# Pro Field 466@3500rpm vs 640@3000rpm
|
plum krazy
|
I know,and are the susopedly 466 really that size ????????????????????? Not much more to make bigger on initial go round,many are oversize for sure,rules are made to be broken -- sorry to say. I Know ----- one bad "apple" in the barrell. |
Re: 9500# Pro Field 466@3500rpm vs 640@3000rpm
|
Be careful
|
Plumkrazy , one should be careful about accusations regarding anothers ride. Let's just say you should put your money where your mouth is and put up the $1100.00 protest fee! Then I warn you that you should also be prepared to lose that $1100. So make sure you take extra money with you for gas money so you can get back home. Be smart and save your money. |
Re: 9500# Pro Field 466@3500rpm vs 640@3000rpm
|
plum krazy
|
if you read correctly,--I NEVER MENTIONED ANYONE SPECIFICALLY !!!!!!!!!!! And to think you are so special that no one is oversized,well then we all wonder why?????????? I have had guys tell me at pulls they were wrong sized,so you sir be careful.Many little pulls acrossed the country where it is run what you brung,and on honor system,as well as bigger more prestige venues,happens all the time. |
Re: 9500# Pro Field 466@3500rpm vs 640@3000rpm
|
Be careful
|
1st off I didn't say you "mentioned anyone specifically". 2nd, where did I say I was so special, and that no one ever cheated? 3rd, what have I done to have to be careful about? I'm not a cheater. 4th, how do you know that I am a sir? 5th, all I was saying was just because some people cheat, that doesn't mean that everyone does. So basically I was letting you know that if you are so certain that one is cheating, that you should put up the money to find out but I was also kind enough to let you know that you should be prepared to lose your money. That's all. |
Re: 9500# Pro Field 466@3500rpm vs 640@3000rpm
|
plum krazy
|
be careful,-- have someone read your words to you and explain them,WTF you argueing about !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! did you pass kd. |
Website Statistics
Global: Topics: 38,793, Posts: 229,997, Members: 3,340.
This forum: Topics: 37,103, Posts: 226,071.
Global: Topics: 38,793, Posts: 229,997, Members: 3,340.
This forum: Topics: 37,103, Posts: 226,071.
Our newest member Jacklovik2009