Thumbs UpSmiling""POLL"" Should the '''existing''' NTPA LPS class be; 600 or 640Confused September 14, 2009 01:32AM
Poll
147 votes were received.
All visitors can vote.
Should the existing NTPA LPS class be;






Should the existing NTPA LPS class be,;



Dick Morgan

www.PULLOFF.com
Independent Pulling News



Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 09/17/2009 12:56AM by Dick Morgan.

Re: Thumbs UpSmiling""POLL"" Should the '''existing''' NTPA LPS class be; 600 or 640Confused September 14, 2009 02:06PM
lets jump it up to 740?

Re: Thumbs UpSmiling""POLL"" Should the '''existing''' NTPA LPS class be; 600 or 640Confused September 14, 2009 03:16PM
This lmt pro class should just disappear when the small cube class gets started. either cuz ntpa doesn't offer it or because there won't be any tractors. MAYBE prostock should be 640

Re: Thumbs UpSmiling""POLL"" Should the '''existing''' NTPA LPS class be; 600 or 640Confused September 14, 2009 03:44PM
wake up there are alot of 640 engines out there that will need a home if this thins s f out

Author:

Your Email:


Subject:


Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically. If the code is hard to read, then just try to guess it right. If you enter the wrong code, a new image is created and you get another chance to enter it right.
Message:
Website Statistics
Global: Topics: 38,771, Posts: 229,938, Members: 3,338.
This forum: Topics: 37,096, Posts: 226,027.

Our newest member Jacklovik2009