12:57:21pm, Friday, May 17, 2024
""POLL"" Should the '''existing''' NTPA LPS class be; 600 or 640
|
Moderator Registered: 03/25/2008 Posts: 1,449 |
Should the existing NTPA LPS class be,; Dick Morgan www.PULLOFF.com Independent Pulling News Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 09/17/2009 12:56AM by Dick Morgan. |
Re: ""POLL"" Should the '''existing''' NTPA LPS class be; 600 or 640
|
sf puller
|
640 |
Re: ""POLL"" Should the '''existing''' NTPA LPS class be; 600 or 640
|
HP
|
640 |
Re: ""POLL"" Should the '''existing''' NTPA LPS class be; 600 or 640
|
j7drmyudft7
|
lets jump it up to 740? |
Re: ""POLL"" Should the '''existing''' NTPA LPS class be; 600 or 640
|
up north
|
This lmt pro class should just disappear when the small cube class gets started. either cuz ntpa doesn't offer it or because there won't be any tractors. MAYBE prostock should be 640 |
Re: ""POLL"" Should the '''existing''' NTPA LPS class be; 600 or 640
|
puller14
|
wake up there are alot of 640 engines out there that will need a home if this thins s f out |
Website Statistics
Global: Topics: 38,771, Posts: 229,938, Members: 3,338.
This forum: Topics: 37,096, Posts: 226,027.
Global: Topics: 38,771, Posts: 229,938, Members: 3,338.
This forum: Topics: 37,096, Posts: 226,027.
Our newest member Jacklovik2009